Site Index:

Home
Contact
Site Map

More Information:

Biography
Top 10 papers
Top 10 projects
Top disappointments
Markov models

In This Section:

Up

News and Info:

Tidbits

to be added

 

Markov models

The following is an annotated list of my experiences with Markov models.

bullet

Cardiac arrhythmias, 1970

bullet

Graduate study, 1970 - 1976

bullet

Cancer screening for BCBSA, 1976

bullet

A Theory of intermittent inspections, 1978

bullet

The American Cancer Society project, 1980

bullet

Medicare coverage of cancer screening, 1983 - 1986

bullet

The WHO model for cancer control priorities, 1986

bullet

The NCI model for setting US national cancer control goals, 1986

bullet

Independent validation of the cervical cancer screening model, 1987

bullet

Kaiser Permanente and the Archimedes model

1970. A Markov model of arrhythmias

I wrote this in 1970 with Will Gersh and Eugene Dong at Stanford, just as I was beginning to study engineering and mathematics. It was my introduction to this modeling technique. According to a PubMed search it is the 7th published Markov model in medicine. It was used in at least one commercially successful automated ICU monitoring system. However I am sure it has been supplanted by better algorithms by now.     (to top)

bullet

Gersh W, Eddy DM, and Dong E. "Cardiac Arrhythmia Classification: A Heart-Beat Interval-Markov Chain Approach." Computers and Biomedical Research 1970; 4:385-392.

Graduate study, 1970 - 1976

I studied Markov models with Dick Smallwood and Ron Howard in the Department of Engineering Economic Systems at Stanford. They were both superb practitioners and teachers. Dick was my mentor. Ron "wrote the book" on Markov models.    (to top)

Design of a cancer screening benefit for BCBSA 1976

The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) asked me to help them design a cancer screening benefit program. This was the first time that an indemnity insurer decided to cover a preventive activity. This is the project that stimulated me to build a Markov model of sequential, or intermittent screening. Based on my analyses, the association created policies to cover screening for mammography, Pap smears (three year) and colon cancer (three to five-year).    (to top)

bullet

Eddy DM. "Rationale for the Cancer Screening Benefit Program Screening Policies." Blue Cross Association and the National Cancer Institute, 1977

A mathematical theory of intermittent inspections, 1978

This is described in the top 10 projects. The problem is described there. The solution required developing many new methods. They are described in detail in the book "Screening for Cancer". They include a new method for time-varying and state-varying models, and the automatic calculation of transition probabilities "on the fly", as functions of the system's past history.

bullet

Eddy DM. "A Methodology for Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Programs" in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, November, 1976

bullet

Eddy DM. Screening for Cancer: Theory, Analysis and Design.  Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice-Hall, Inc 1980 (book)

bullet

A paper in the mathematical journal Operations Research, which I can't find.

bullet

Eddy DM. "A Mathematical Model for Timing of Repeated Medical Tests." Medical Decision Making 1983; 3:45-62. (Reprinted in Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, Supplement 171, 1984.)     (to top)

American Cancer Society guidelines, 1980

This is described in the top 10 projects. Even though I did not have to develop any new mathematics for this project, beyond what was already  in the theory of intermittent inspections, this project is very important because it represents the first time a mathematical model was used to design a national guideline. The model was scoured for two years by very skeptical physicians and managers.

The original paper was

bullet

Eddy DM. "Guidelines for the Cancer-Related Checkup. Recommendations and Rationale." Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 1980; 30:193-240.

At least 20 other publications are related to this work. Some of the highlights (in reverse order) are   (to top)

bullet

Eddy DM. "Screening for Breast Cancer." Annals of Internal Medicine 1989; 111:389-399     Reprinted in Common Screening Tests, DM Eddy (Ed) Philadelphia, American College of Physicians, 1991. Reprinted in Selected Readings in General Surgery 1990

bullet

Eddy DM. "Screening for Lung Cancer." Annals of Internal Medicine 1989; 111:232-237. Reprinted in Common Screening Tests, DM Eddy (Ed) Philadelphia, American College of Physicians, 1991

bullet

Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, McGivney W, Hendee W. "The Value of Mammography Screening in Women under Age 50." Journal of the American Medical Association 1988; 259:1512-1519

bullet

Eddy DM, Nugent FW, Eddy JF, Coller J. Gilbertsen V, Gottlieb LS, Rice R, Sherlock P. Winawer S. "Screening for Colorectal Cancer in a High-risk Population: Results of a Mathematical Model. "Gastroenterology. 1987 March; 92(3):682-92.

bullet

Eddy DM. "Technology Assessment: The Role of Mathematical Modeling." Section in Assessing Medical Technologies, Institute of Medicine, Washington DC, National Academy Press, 1985

bullet

Eddy DM. "Finding Cancer in Asymptomatic People." Cancer 1983; 51:2440-2445. Biases. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1982

bullet

Eddy DM, Shwartz M. "The Application of Mathematical Models in Screening." Chapter in    D Schottenfeld, J Fraumeni (Eds) Cancer Epidemiology  and Prevention. WB Saunders Company, 1982

bullet

McNeil B, Eddy DM. "The Costs and Effects of Screening for Cancer Among Asbestos-Exposed Workers." Journal of Chronic Diseases 1982; 35:351-385

bullet

Eddy DM. "The Economics of Cancer Prevention and Detection: Getting More for Less. "Cancer. 1981 Mar 1;47(5 Suppl):1200-9.

bullet

Eddy DM. "Detection of Lung Cancer." JAMA.1981 Aug 7;246 (6):621-2

bullet

Eddy DM. "Appropriateness of Cervical Cancer Screening." Gynecologic Oncology 1981 Oct 12: S168-S187

bullet

Eddy DM. "The Economics of Cancer Prevention and Detection." Cancer 1981; 47:1200-1209

bullet

Eddy DM. "Evaluation of a Screening Program in Oncology." Bulletin Cancer (Paris) 1980; 67:515-523

bullet

Eddy DM. "Computer Models and the Evaluation of Colon Cancer Screening Programs." Chapter in S Winawer, D Schottenfeld and P Sherlock (Eds) Colorectal Cancer: Prevention, Epidemiology  and Screening. New York, Raven Press, 1980   (to top)

Medicare coverage of cancer screening, 1981 - 1986

IN the years after the ACS report I was called on to help develop a case for coverage of cancer screening by Medicare. (By statute, Medicare does not cover preventive services. The decision to cover cancer screening required a congressional mandate. I was asked to do the cost-effectiveness analyses. Much of this work, which involved Markov models, was commissioned by Congress through the Office of Technology Assessment.

bullet

Eddy DM. "Screening for Colon Cancer: A Technology Assessment." Background Paper #2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies in The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology. Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment, 1981

bullet

Eddy DM. "Testimony on Technology Assessment to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources." U.S. Senate, 1984

bullet

Eddy DM. "The Effectiveness, Cost, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening with Annual Mammography and Breast Physical Examination for Women over 65." Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Health, U.S. House of Representatives, 1986

bullet

Eddy DM. "Breast Cancer Screening for Women over Age 65." U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment for submission to the U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, as part of the report "Breast Cancer Screening for Medicare Beneficiaries. Effectiveness and Costs to Medicare and Medical Resources Required." Washington DC, U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, November 1987.    (to top)

WHO model: cancer control priorities in developing countries, 1985-1986

This is described in the top 10 projects

bullet

Eddy DM. "Setting Priorities for Cancer Control Programs." Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1986; 76:187-199

bullet

Eddy DM. "The Use of Quantitative Methods in Planning National Cancer Control Programs." Bulletin of the World Health Organization 64:683-693, 1986

bullet

Stjernswärd J, Stanley K, Eddy DM, et al. " National Cancer Control Programs and Setting Priorities." Cancer Detection and Prevention 1986; 9:113-124

bullet

Eddy DM. "Secondary Prevention of Cancer: An Overview."  Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1986; 64:421-429    (to top)

National Cancer Institute: Cancer control objectives for the year 2000, 1986

This is described in the top 10 projects

bullet

Eddy DM. "A Computer-Based Model for the Design of Cancer Control Strategies." National Cancer Institute Monographs 1986; 2:75-82

bullet

Eddy DM. "CAN*TROL: A Computer Model for Designing National Cancer Control Strategies.."Bull Cancer. 1987;74(3):323-32

bullet

Levin DL, Gail MH, Kessler LG, Eddy DM. "A Model for Projecting Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Presence of Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Programs." National Cancer Institute Monographs 1986; 2:83-93    (to top)

Validation of the cervical cancer screening model, 1987

The publication of a paper by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) gave me an opportunity to conduct an independent validation of the screening model. The results I published in 1980 predicted what they found 7 years later using data from about a million women, to within 3% (relative). This is the only independent, prospective validation cited in the book on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (Gold et al editors).    (to top)

bullet

Eddy DM. "The Frequency of Cervical Cancer Screening. Comparison of a Mathematical Model with Empirical Data." Cancer 1987; 60:1117-1122

Kaiser Permanente and the Archimedes model, 1990 -

In 1990 I became a Senior Advisor to Kaiser Permanente Southern California. There I began to work with practicing clinicians and administrators on information systems, guidelines, assessment of new technologies and medical necessity decisions, and priority setting. These decisions involve a much higher level of clinical and administrative detail, and much more realism than the national and international-level work I had been doing. I found that the Markov structure was not well suited to these "rubber-meets-the-road" types of problems. As a consequence, I began to think of other ways to apply quantitative methods. The result was the Archimedes project. It is entirely different than a Markov model, driven by different types of problems. For more information on Archimedes, click here. (If it is password protected, contact me).    (to top)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1.  

 

 

 

Biography • Top 10 papers • Top 10 projects • Top disappointments • Markov models

 

 

David M. Eddy © 2003
All Rights Reserved
Email:  david.eddy@archimedesmodel.com